TNA Board

Sorry, but no "100% GFE" specifies a Cbj.   A session must include BBbj to qualify for the claim of 100% GFE.

That is all.

twak twak

U go Nikki!!! Twak, Twak back into your hole yoyo! Obviously he has never seen you.

nikki delreo wrote:

twakker wrote:

Sorry, but no "100% GFE" specifies a Cbj.   A session must include BBbj to qualify for the claim of 100% GFE.

That is all.

twak twak

whatever!!! get off my page, i have no complaints!!

Um, actually it's not really your page - being as how all members are entitled to post their opinions in this part of the forum...  and it's my opinion that claiming a CBJ qualifies as "100% GFE" is an insult to the many great providers here who actually DO offer the full GFE package.

But hey, whatever lie gets ya by...

twak twak
(PS: flame on, white-knights - in your hearts you know I'm right; there's a long list of qualities that certify a provider "100% GFE", and CBJ ain't on that list.)

MONDAY SPECIALS I AM STILL HONORING TODAY GUYS!!!

gold59wing wrote:

Hey Twak, don't see any reviews by u lately. Only someone sitting in front of your screen in a dim room. If your not really in the game u probably don't know what you are talking about.

Actually, I do.

This board has a number of very fine providers who really DO offer "100% GFE" service, and from personal experience I can name a few:  Kira ("love60"), Shawni Royel ("ShawniRoyel09"), Tiffany Taylor ("SeductivePoison"), Shyla ("Eastside Shyla")...  Not only that, but by a simple reading of ads I can see that there are many, many others (whom I'm not acquainted with) that also offer actual "100% GFE".

Claiming to be "100% GFE" when she's not is not only unfair to those who are, it's also potentially deceptive to an unsuspecting hobbyist.  There are lots of ways to advertise for a provider who insists on CBJ, and other providers on this forum have used such descriptions  - "covered GFE", "GFE lite", etc.  But out of fairness to the girls who DO provide true "100% GFE" (which includes, by virtually everyone's definition, BBBJ) this provider should not be claiming to offer something she clearly does not.

And, for the very fine Nikki, I'm sure you have a loyal and devoted fan base and your services are top notch (though I'll never personally find out because I prefer full GFE).  Surely there's no need for you to make claims that aren't true.  Now, I've expressed my opinion and said what I wanted to say.  If your white knight ("gold59wing") wants to continue to debate and/or insult I'll continue to stand my ground - otherwise, I'm happily gone.

twak twak

Rick wrote:

gold59wing wrote:

Hey Twak, don't see any reviews by u lately. Only someone sitting in front of your screen in a dim room. If your not really in the game u probably don't know what you are talking about.

You got that right, a search reveals Twakker does not have ANY Seattle area reviews.  Probably just a pooner-wannabe kid on his mom's computer, heh heh.  Try making some positive contributions to the board, Twakker!

As I see it, this is a positive contribution.  The acronyms we use need to be well-defined, or else why use them at all?  Blur that line and you might as well forget about a provider's menu entirely.

The fact that I choose to not submit reviews does not, in any way, invalidate my position - but the fact you and "gold59wing" can only counter with insults and immature suppositions pretty much proves that you really can't counter it with any intelligent response.  I mean, if you really are of the position that "100% GFE" includes oral sex only with a condom in place then argue THAT - if you think you can.

I'm only interested in providers who offer a total GFE, which unarguably includes BBBJ.  Nikki Delreo is undeniably beautiful and by all accounts offers a great experience, but I haven't bothered to call her because she has always been a CBJ girl.  In fact, I've generally taken to totally ignoring her ads for this reason.  So when I see an ad headline that reads: "MISS NIKKI IS BACK!! 100% GFE..." I am naturally quite interested.  To any intelligent reader - which seems to preclude the two of you - it sounds like Nikki may have made a significant change in her BJ policy.  Turns out she hasn't, and instead is just (in my opinion) misusing a well-defined acronym to draw in customers.  The truth can be found in her "fine print", but the headline reeks of bait & switch.

twak twak <--- needs to sign off so Mom can check her eBay listings

rv221a wrote:

OOOOOH, I am sooooo coming for that.  I have to do some re-arranging tho.  The TDL for sure.

you should definitely give me a try. cant wait......xoxo

Actually--it is her ad--it is her page and ad crapping is not cool. if you want to discuss something, post it in discussions.

A real GFE makes you change the oil in her car, take out the trash, and clean the garage before bed. by the time you get there, you're too tired and she's sound aslep.

twakker wrote:

nikki delreo wrote:

twakker wrote:

Sorry, but no "100% GFE" specifies a Cbj.   A session must include BBbj to qualify for the claim of 100% GFE.

That is all.

twak twak

whatever!!! get off my page, i have no complaints!!

Um, actually it's not really your page - being as how all members are entitled to post their opinions in this part of the forum...  and it's my opinion that claiming a CBJ qualifies as "100% GFE" is an insult to the many great providers here who actually DO offer the full GFE package.

But hey, whatever lie gets ya by...

twak twak
(PS: flame on, white-knights - in your hearts you know I'm right; there's a long list of qualities that certify a provider "100% GFE", and CBJ ain't on that list.)